A Republican congressman has introduced new legislation aimed at supporting former President Donald Trump’s controversial aspiration to acquire Greenland, suggesting a new name for the territory: “Red, White, and Blueland.” Representative Buddy Carter from Georgia announced the Red, White, and Blueland Act of 2025, which would direct the Secretary of the Interior to facilitate federal updates to reflect this new moniker, allegedly in support of Trump’s national security objectives.
Despite Trump’s intensified push to purchase Greenland, which has been a longstanding point of contention with Denmark, the Danish government firmly maintains that the territory is not for sale. Carter’s proposed bill includes a six-month deadline for the changes, reflecting what he claims would be a bold move for America. “America is back and will soon be bigger than ever with the addition of Red, White, and Blueland,” Carter stated, praising Trump’s efforts and framing the acquisition as a priority for national security.
This proposal arrives in the context of a broader dispute, as recent polls indicate that a mere 6 percent of Greenland’s population supports joining the United States. Additionally, 85 percent of Greenlanders express a desire to remain separate from the U.S., with only a small fraction undecided.
In a humorous reaction, Danish citizens have initiated a campaign dubbed “Denmarkification” to raise funds for purchasing California, rebranding it as “New Denmark.” This campaign highlights the growing political satire and light-hearted responses to the ongoing discussions regarding Greenland’s status.
The proposed legislation by Carter must first be reviewed by a committee before it can be presented for a vote in the House. Trump’s earlier endeavors have included a visit by his son to Greenland, signaling the administration’s continued interest in the territory, even as public sentiment in Greenland leans heavily against such a move.
As the discourse surrounding this proposal unfolds, it raises significant questions about U.S. foreign policy and relations with Denmark. Engaging Greenland’s residents and government in discussions may be crucial to navigating these intricate geopolitical waters. While the notion of territorial expansion may seem appealing, the reality is that genuine discourse and consent of the people are essential components of international relations moving forward.