Bridget Brink, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, recently shared her reasons for resigning in April, citing significant disagreements with President Donald Trump’s approach to foreign policy. In her op-ed for the Detroit Free Press, Brink highlighted her discontent with what she perceived as inappropriate pressure placed on Ukraine rather than the aggressor, Russia.
Brink, who served as ambassador from May 2022 until her resignation, stated, “I respect the president’s right and responsibility to determine U.S. foreign policy — with proper checks and balances by U.S. Congress.” However, she criticized the Trump administration’s strategy, emphasizing that “peace at any price is not peace at all — it is appeasement.” This marks a stark contrast to the previous administration led by President Joe Biden, which was more openly supportive of Ukraine.
Interestingly, Brink’s statements shifted to a more neutral tone following Trump’s inauguration in January 2025, as he focused on a rapid resolution to the conflict in Ukraine. Prior to her departure, she faced criticism from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, who criticized her reaction to a tragic missile strike in Kryvyi Rih that resulted in multiple casualties.
Brink’s resignation reflects the complexities and challenges within U.S. foreign policy, particularly in relation to Ukraine and its ongoing conflict with Russia. Her departure serves as a reminder that political leadership can significantly shape international relations and responses to crises. It’s a pivotal moment for Ukraine, as it continues to navigate its geopolitical struggles while seeking support from global allies.
Overall, while Brink’s resignation raises concerns about consistency in U.S. support for Ukraine, it also underscores the importance of strong diplomatic leadership during turbulent times.