Boston sports radio is currently grappling with a wave of denial as fans and commentators react to the Celtics’ surprising setback against the New York Knicks in the Eastern Conference Semifinals. After two consecutive losses where the Celtics allowed the Knicks to overcome daunting 20-point deficits, the frustration among Boston sports media is palpable.
Despite the Knicks’ impressive performances, which saw them clinch both Game 1 and Game 2, figures like Mike Felger from 98.5 The Sports Hub have remained dismissive, labeling the Knicks as “trash” and insisting they are not worthy of serious consideration. Felger’s remarks capture the essence of a die-hard Boston fan’s perspective, who finds it challenging to accept the Knicks’ surge against the Celtics.
This sentiment reflects a broader trend among Boston sports commentators, who often struggle to give credit where it’s due to rival teams. Even amidst the evidence of the Knicks’ resilience, which has now put the Celtics in a precarious position, many refuse to acknowledge their strength. Instead, some, like Celtics reporter Chris Forsberg, have made excuses for the Celtics’ performance, attributing their losses to external factors rather than recognizing the skillful play of the Knicks.
As the series progresses, the Celtics face the challenge of overcoming not only their historical dominance over the Knicks but also their own self-doubt, particularly in high-pressure situations like fourth quarters. If the Knicks continue to perform at their current level, they may well force a shift in how they are perceived, even by the staunchest Boston supporters.
In looking at the broader context, this rivalry serves as a reminder that in sports, perception can often lag behind reality, and respecting the competition can be vital for a team’s success. The Knicks are demonstrating that they are a force to be reckoned with, and perhaps this series will be the turning point in reshaping how they are viewed in the eyes of critics.