The potential for stricter measures against Jair Bolsonaro has increased following a video posted by his son, Flávio Bolsonaro, that may have violated cautionary measures set by the Supreme Federal Court (STF). Legal experts suggest that this incident could pave the way for a preventive detention, contingent on the STF’s assessment.
In the video, originally shared on Flávio Bolsonaro’s Instagram account, Jair Bolsonaro is seen at home wearing a Brazilian flag shirt and showing off his electronic ankle monitor. He addressed supporters gathered in Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro. Despite Flávio deleting the video shortly after posting it, experts argue that the act itself constitutes a breach of the court-imposed restrictions by Minister Alexandre de Moraes.
Legal scholar Virgínia Machado emphasizes that deleting the video does not negate the original act due to the vast sharing capabilities of the internet. Adib Abdouni, a criminal lawyer, notes that this incident could indeed lead to a tougher judicial response, including the possibility of imprisonment. However, he warns that any further action must be approached cautiously due to Bolsonaro’s public profile and the implications that could arise from increased scrutiny.
The gravity of preventive detention—typically invoked after lesser measures are violated—is underscored by Machado’s analysis. The legal community is divided on whether Flávio’s actions directly implicate Jair Bolsonaro. Rafael Paiva expresses concerns about the complexities of applying such measures to a sitting former president, arguing that caution must guide any decisions to avoid exacerbating the situation.
As discussions continue regarding the appropriate legal responses, the situation remains fluid, with many awaiting the STF’s definitive stance on the matter. This evolving legal landscape highlights the challenges of maintaining accountability while navigating the complexities involved with high-profile political figures. It also points to a need for clear legal frameworks surrounding social media engagements in the context of judicial restrictions.