The bail review application for Ratu Lote Lewaivanua, one of two police officers arrested for allegedly importing and possessing 4.7 kilograms of liquid methamphetamine, has been denied by Magistrate Charles Ratakele. The magistrate determined that there were no significant changes in Lewaivanua’s circumstances to warrant a review of the previous bail denial.
Lewaivanua, who is 31 years old, was charged alongside 43-year-old Sevuloni Lubi. In addition to the drug-related charges, Lewaivanua was also found with $650, which is suspected to be proceeds from illicit activities. His initial bail application was turned down on September 15, prompting him to seek a review. During the latest hearing, Prosecutor Unal Lal reiterated the State’s strong opposition to granting bail due to the grave nature of the charges.
The defense argued for bail based on the acquisition of new legal representation and expressed concerns regarding the conditions in the remand center, citing issues such as overcrowding, poor living conditions, and insufficient meals. They referred to a recent legal case involving Justin Ho to bolster their argument.
However, Magistrate Ratakele criticized the defense for failing to provide legal precedents that would support their claim that merely obtaining new counsel represented a valid change in circumstances. He acknowledged the poor conditions in the remand center but underscored that such factors do not outweigh the seriousness of the alleged offenses, particularly in drug cases. He suggested that if Lewaivanua believes his rights are being compromised, he should bring the issue before the High Court.
As the case moves forward, it is noteworthy that the bail application for Lubi is set to be heard on November 5, which will provide further insights into how the judiciary handles serious drug offenses involving law enforcement personnel.
This case exemplifies a broader commitment within Fiji’s legal system to uphold the rule of law and maintain accountability, even among those in positions of authority. The judiciary’s firm stance on serious crimes is crucial in reinforcing public confidence in law enforcement, demonstrating that no individual is above the law.