Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s transformation into a significant figure in American politics is evident when comparing two of her speeches. The first, delivered at the 2020 Democratic National Convention, came shortly after she was elected to Congress. In that address, she expressed her commitment to a mass movement aimed at establishing modern social, economic, and human rights, alongside a need to address issues of racial injustice, colonization, misogyny, and homophobia. Her speech primarily resonated with her base, focusing on leftist ideals but lacking broader voter appeal.
In contrast, her recent speech at this year’s Democratic National Convention showcased a marked evolution. Connecting her own story to broader populist themes, the 34-year-old congresswoman energized the Democratic audience, which erupted in chants of her name. The complex terminology of elite progressive circles was replaced by relatable, impactful statements, such as her critique of a political opponent while also embracing her working-class background. “Ever since I got elected, Republicans have attacked me by saying that I should go back to bartending. But let me tell you, I’m happy to—any day of the week—because there is nothing wrong with working for a living,” she asserted.
The difference in these speeches can be attributed to practical circumstances. The first took place during the pandemic without a live audience and was designed to rally the left behind Joe Biden, rather than unite the broader Democratic Party. More importantly, Ocasio-Cortez has shifted her focus to shaping the Democratic Party’s future instead of merely advocating for leftist ideals.
Ocasio-Cortez embodies two seemingly conflicting identities: the Bronx bartender who challenged the political establishment and the educated activist who discusses complex issues. This dichotomy affects her communication style, as she now aims to represent not just a movement but the entire party. Once an outsider known for protests against leaders like Nancy Pelosi, she has successfully navigated her way into a more influential position, functioning as a connector between mainstream and progressive factions within the party.
However, her change in strategy has not come without backlash. Recently, the Democratic Socialists of America withdrew their endorsement, criticizing her views on Israel. While Ocasio-Cortez has continually expressed concern over Israel’s actions in Gaza and the Biden administration’s stance, her willingness to engage with Jewish leaders and acknowledge anti-Semitism within some anti-Zionist circles led to discontent among some of her supporters. During her speech at the DNC, she was the first to discuss Gaza, advocating for a ceasefire and the return of hostages.
Despite previous tensions, political figures from the center have begun to recognize her effectiveness. Jay Jacobs, chairman of the New York State Democratic Party, who had expressed skepticism about her far-left policies, acknowledged her outstanding performance at the convention, signaling a shifting dynamic.
Should Ocasio-Cortez continue on her current path and avoid the pitfalls of intra-party conflicts, she may soon find herself in a position where political leaders realize they require her influence more than she needs theirs.