In a distressing account, Scarlett Pavlovich, a 22-year-old drama student from Auckland, has come forward with allegations of sexual assault against renowned author Neil Gaiman. The incident, which reportedly took place in February 2022, has drawn attention following a series of similar allegations that emerged against Gaiman earlier this year.
Pavlovich recounted her initial encounter with Amanda Palmer, Gaiman’s estranged wife, which started a relationship that would ultimately lead to her babysitting for Gaiman and Palmer’s child. As their relationship evolved, Pavlovich found herself increasingly involved in Gaiman’s personal life. However, during a weekend babysitting stay, the situation took a dark turn when Gaiman allegedly confronted her while she was in his bathtub, leading to a disturbing series of sexual acts that Pavlovich describes as non-consensual.
According to Pavlovich, Gaiman offered her a bath and later entered the tub naked. While initially engaging in small talk, things escalated rapidly as he allegedly coerced her into sexual activity against her will. Her account includes graphic descriptions of the assault, reflecting a pattern of manipulative behavior that several other women have also reported since allegations against Gaiman surfaced this summer.
The situation intensified as Pavlovich’s revelations began to unfold. Gaiman and Palmer’s tumultuous relationship set the stage for complex dynamics, with Palmer allegedly warning Gaiman about the potential impact on Pavlovich. Despite this, Pavlovich ended up isolated in a vulnerable situation with Gaiman, who, as described, wielded his power with alarming disregard for consent.
The recent allegations have sparked discussions about the culture of consent and the responsibilities of individuals in positions of authority, especially within creative communities, where relationships between fans, artists, and creators can often blur personal boundaries.
Pavlovich has since moved on from the traumatic experience, currently pursuing a degree in English literature at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland as she seeks to reclaim her narrative. She is also actively engaging with other women who have had similar experiences, emphasizing the importance of solidarity among survivors.
This troubling case raises vital questions about consent, power dynamics, and the experiences of individuals within creative professions. It serves as a reminder of the need for better accountability and transparency to ensure the safety and well-being of all individuals, particularly younger or less experienced members within artistic communities.
In a hopeful light, Pavlovich’s journey towards healing and the formation of supportive networks among survivors may pave the way for a broader discussion on the importance of shared experiences in reclaiming voices and fostering resilience against abuse.