Three school districts in Alaska have joined a lawsuit against the Department of Education over its decision to freeze $6 billion in federal education funds. The suit, filed in Rhode Island’s U.S. District Court, involves the Anchorage School District, the Fairbanks North Star Borough School District, and the Kuspuk School District, representing a total of 14 districts, teacher federations, and educational associations. They will be represented by the nonprofit organization Democracy Forward.
Anchorage School District Superintendent Dr. Jharrett Bryantt expressed concern about the destabilizing effects of the funding freeze. He emphasized that these funds are vital for supporting English learners and families engaged in agricultural work, logging, or fishing. Without the financial support, districts face challenges in planning and fulfilling their obligations to students.
Kuspuk School District, a small district with about 320 students spread across 120 miles, is particularly affected by the freeze. Superintendent Dr. Madeline Aguillard highlighted that funding is critical for providing essential services like summer programs, teacher recruitment, and emergency communications, as their district lacks a local tax base. She noted that for rural districts like Kuspuk, the absence of resources such as libraries or gyms makes these funds even more essential.
The financial challenges in Alaska’s school systems extend beyond federal cuts. Governor Mike Dunleavy previously vetoed approximately $51 million in education funding, a decision that was later overturned by the Legislature. Additionally, the state’s school board is considering changes to funding rules that could further constrict resources for schools in districts already stretched thin.
The Anchorage School District, anticipating nearly $12 million in frozen funds, had to make staffing cuts due to the financial crisis, underscoring the real impact such decisions have on local education.
Democracy Forward’s President and CEO, Skye Perryman, condemned the funding freeze as an unconstitutional action that prioritizes political agendas over student welfare and undermines the educational resources intended for these communities.
This situation illustrates a growing concern among educational stakeholders regarding the effects of funding uncertainties on student programs and district operations. As these districts take legal action, there is hope that the courts will affirm the need for stable funding and uphold commitments made to prioritize education.