Rapper A$AP Rocky, whose real name is Rakim Mayers, was acquitted of two felony charges related to an alleged 2021 shooting incident involving his former friend and bandmate, Terell Ephron, also known as A$AP Relli. The jury reached its verdict after a three-week trial, where prosecutors painted Mayers as the aggressor who fired shots during a heated altercation sparked by an argument.
Upon hearing the verdict, A$AP Rocky embraced his supporters and legal team in the courtroom, expressing gratitude to God and the jury for their decision. “We really want to thank the jury for making the right decision,” he stated outside the Los Angeles Superior Court.
During the trial, Deputy District Attorney Paul Przelomiec emphasized that the case hinged on whether Mayers used a real firearm or a prop gun. The defense argued that Ephron was actually the aggressor that night, having allegedly assaulted Mayers twice and displayed jealousy over his success. A$AP Rocky’s lawyer highlighted that the rapper chose not to testify and rejected a plea deal that would have involved 180 days in jail, emphasizing his innocence.
Reports noted that the prosecution, led by former District Attorney George Gascón and continued by Nathan Hochman, intends to uphold accountability among celebrities, regardless of their fame or influence.
Key witnesses for the defense included A$AP Twelvyy, who identified Mayers’ gun as a prop intended for self-defense due to prior violent encounters, and Rocky’s tour manager. The jury ultimately found sufficient doubt regarding the prosecutor’s claims.
Rihanna, Mayers’ partner, was seen supporting him in court along with their two children, which reinforced the personal stake the couple has in the proceedings. The courtroom atmosphere following the verdict was jubilant, with supporters expressing their joy over the decision.
This outcome not only clears A$AP Rocky of significant legal problems but also underscores the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence, reflecting a positive note amidst the challenges faced by many in the public eye. The case serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding celebrity legal issues and the public’s perception of justice.