The landscape of college football roster construction has undergone a significant transformation in recent years, primarily due to the introduction of the transfer portal, Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, and changes in revenue sharing. These developments have substantially altered how coaches and programs strategize and function in assembling their teams.
While many programs capitalize on the opportunities presented by NIL payments and the transfer portal, challenges continue to arise from the evolving regulatory environment within college football. Steve Sarkisian, head coach of Texas, shed light on a crucial issue he believes needs addressing as he navigates the portal during roster building. Although Texas possesses ample resources, Sarkisian expressed concern over the absence of a certification process for player agents, leading to complications in negotiations.
“It’s all so strategic, right? It’s one about need. It’s two about money and the cost and where’s the market and which agent you’re dealing with,” Sarkisian articulated. He explained that the landscape is crowded with agents, some lacking experience and understanding of the college market dynamics. “In the NFL, you have to be certified. In college football, it may be their college roommate their freshman year who’s their agent right now, and this guy is throwing numbers at you. It’s unfortunate.”
While some may perceive coaches’ grievances regarding NIL and the transfer portal as mere complaints, Sarkisian’s concerns about inexperienced agents navigating negotiations resonate deeply within the current college football environment. Texas has faced its share of challenges recently, with 13 players announcing their entry into the transfer portal and opting out of the Citrus Bowl, including notable talents like running backs Tre Wisner and wide receiver DeAndre Moore Jr.
Looking ahead, it is anticipated that a governing body will emerge in college football to establish regulations and a certification process for agents. This would ideally lead to players being represented by more knowledgeable and professional agents. However, the timeline for these necessary changes remains uncertain, as the NCAA hesitates in response to potential anti-trust litigation and has awaited Congressional action, none of which have yielded concrete solutions thus far.
For now, coaches and general managers will have to navigate the complex landscape, dealing with inexperienced agents asking for exorbitant demands, even for programs like Texas, which have considerable resources. As the college football dynamics continue to evolve, there is hope that a more structured and regulated environment will emerge, ultimately benefiting both players and programs alike.