Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka has recently indicated that he might contemplate resignation if his government’s appeal against a recent High Court decision fails. In an interview with The Fiji Times, he acknowledged the seriousness of the situation and suggested that stepping down could be a viable option if the court ruling is maintained. “I will consider it. I am considering it,” Rabuka stated, underscoring the importance of personal accountability in his role. When further questioned, he confirmed, “Yes. That is an option.”
This case centers on the dismissal of former FICAC commissioner Barbara Malimali, a decision for which Rabuka has personally taken responsibility, distancing others in his administration from any blame. He claimed, “If the appeal process failed, then I must admit that I made the wrong decision or gave the wrong advice. Nobody else gave that advice. I made it.”
Despite potential public disapproval over the expenses related to pursuing another legal challenge, Rabuka stood by his choice to appeal the High Court ruling, emphasizing his constitutional rights as a citizen of Fiji. “So is the judge. So, I will have to exercise the right that I have as a citizen of Fiji,” he asserted, highlighting the necessity to explore all legal avenues, with the possibility of escalating the matter to the Supreme Court if required.
Additionally, as he navigates these legal challenges, Rabuka responded to concerns regarding his confidence in the legal counsel available to his government, particularly as elections approach. He admitted that while he has consulted the Attorney-General, certain circumstances have restricted his access to critical legal advice at key moments. He noted that in light of this, he has relied on the Constitution, specifically referencing sections 81 and 82 for guidance in advising the President.
Rabuka’s willingness to consider resignation reflects his commitment to accountability and transparency, all while managing the intricate challenges inherent in governance and legal examination in Fiji. His determination to pursue legal options underscores a dedication to the rule of law, which may play a pivotal role in shaping the future dynamics of his administration and the public’s trust in government. This proactive stance might inspire confidence among citizens, as they witness their leaders grappling with legal truth and accountability.