In Harris County, Texas, a criminal defense attorney is expressing frustration over the Harris County Constable Precinct 4’s use of social media to post images of his client, despite the dismissal of a DWI case against him. Attorney Michael Stoll contends that the social media posts, which display his client being detained and undergoing a field sobriety test, lack important context and suggest wrongdoing without clarification.
Stoll noted that while similar law enforcement social media pages often highlight their activities, they also typically include disclaimers regarding the presumption of innocence. He pointed out that one specific post from December 6 described his client simply as a “drunk driver” without indicating that the case had been dismissed. The judge presiding over the case had found no probable cause to continue, leading to the dismissal before his client was able to bond out.
Despite Stoll’s request for the removal of the posts—including a later reposting that identified his client among other suspected offenders—Precinct 4 did not comply. Stoll expressed concern that these permanent online records could have lasting repercussions for his client. He emphasized that even years later, a simple internet search could reveal these photos and tarnish his client’s reputation.
Another attorney, Johnathan White, echoed Stoll’s sentiments, highlighting the ethical implications of public shaming when identifiable information is shared. White remarked that while informing the community of law enforcement activities is essential, the manner in which it is done must be approached with sensitivity.
In response to media inquiries, Precinct 4 stated they are unable to monitor all social media interactions and were unaware of the request to remove the posts. Although they communicated with Stoll regarding the situation, officials indicated uncertainty about whether the images would ultimately be taken down, as the case has been refiled.
This incident raises important discussions around the responsibilities of law enforcement in balancing public information dissemination with the presumption of innocence, illustrating the ongoing challenges faced in the age of social media.