The proposed Employment Relations (Amendment) Bill is stirring concern among small business owners, with potential implications for workplace dynamics that could shift from collaboration to strict enforcement measures. The Suva Retailers Association voiced these apprehensions during their submissions to the Standing Committee on Economic Affairs.
Association President Jitesh Patel emphasized that the bill places undue focus on penalties, inspections, and prosecutions rather than fostering a productive dialogue between employers and employees. He highlighted that small and family-owned businesses might face severe repercussions, as even minor administrative errors could result in substantial fines or jail time.
Patel explained that while larger corporations can absorb these costs, smaller retailers could face closures due to their inability to manage the financial burden of hefty fines. He expressed a belief that compliance should stem from education, not fear. Most small businesses lack human resources departments and rely instead on strong, daily communication and trust with workers.
“Regulations must be proportional to business size and capability,” Patel stated, reinforcing the notion that many retailers operate as small entities without the resources typical of larger corporate structures. Often, a single business owner manages numerous tasks, from customer service to payroll.
Committee member Semi Koroilavesau acknowledged these concerns, noting that similar issues have emerged during discussions with other private sector representatives. Despite the concerns, committee members underscored that the bill’s primary goal is to protect workers from potential exploitation, such as wage theft, particularly for those hesitant to voice their concerns.
As the Standing Committee continues to evaluate the bill, it is crucial to balance the need for worker protections with the realities faced by small businesses, ensuring that regulations support rather than hinder their operations.