Public sentiment towards the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) is currently divided, particularly with increasing calls for the commission to be disbanded, as many view it as a political instrument rather than an oversight body. In response to these concerns, FICAC Acting Commissioner Lavi Rokoika stressed that only Parliament has the authority to determine the future of the commission.
Rokoika acknowledged the public’s right to express their opinions, stating, “People are entitled to their views.” However, she emphasized that any decision regarding the dissolution of FICAC must adhere to a legal framework, underlining that it is outside the commission’s purview to dictate its own fate. “This organisation was created by law, and it’s outside of the Office of the Commissioner to decide its fate,” she clarified.
The Acting Commissioner also addressed the difficulties FICAC faces in its investigative work, which can sometimes prove complex and need to be handled on a case-by-case basis. She admitted that certain challenges lead to delays in processing cases, noting, “We recognize that there are obstacles. However, we must continue our duties in line with our statutory mandate. When there is no evidentiary basis to proceed, we close the files accordingly.”
Rokoika’s statements reaffirm FICAC’s commitment to fulfilling its role as an oversight entity, despite the external pressures and critiques it endures. Her remarks reflect a steadfast dedication to maintaining the integrity of the commission and adhering to its legal framework. As FICAC moves forward, it seems well-equipped to address its challenges while remaining committed to its mission of combating corruption effectively.