The tribunal investigating the conduct of suspended Corrections Commissioner Dr. Jalesi Nakarawa has heard serious allegations regarding his strained working relationship with Justice Minister Siromi Turaga. Testimonies indicate that this breakdown has affected morale and operations within the Fiji Corrections Service (FCS).
James Koroitubuna, Dr. Nakarawa’s acting personal staff officer, noted in his testimony that Dr. Nakarawa made no attempts to mend his relationship with Minister Turaga. This resistance to addressing the minister’s concerns has reportedly led to lower morale amid the staff and impaired the overall relationship between the corrections service and the ministry itself. Koroitubuna highlighted that Dr. Nakarawa often failed to respond to media inquiries or address issues raised by the minister, which contributed to a lack of resolution regarding operations within the FCS.
During the tribunal session, Koroitubuna described the decision-making process under Dr. Nakarawa as largely top-down, neglecting proper consultations and processes. He indicated that Dr. Nakarawa had exceeded his authority by failing to secure the minister’s approval for various decisions and policies that required such oversight.
Further allegations pertain to the appointment of Dr. Nakarawa’s wife, Vakaloloma Nakarawa, as a nurse practitioner and her subsequent promotion to the role of chief medical officer, which Koroitubuna deemed unethical and contrary to expected standards for holders of constitutional positions.
As the tribunal proceeds, Dr. Nakarawa is set to offer his testimony on November 22. The ongoing discussions surrounding his conduct reflect a critical moment within the governance framework of the FCS.
These hearings are crucial for establishing accountability and transparency in the Fiji government, especially in light of previous concerns about governance within the FCS. Justice Minister Siromi Turaga has also pointed out broader systemic issues, advocating for reforms to restore trust and improve operational standards within public institutions.
The potential for reform stemming from this inquiry may pave the way for enhanced governance practices, aiming to restore confidence in Fiji’s correctional system and promote accountability within public service roles. As this case unfolds, it underscores the importance of ethical standards and due process in strengthening public confidence in government institutions.
