The Supreme Court of Fiji recently altered the prison sentences of two men involved in the aggravated robbery and abduction of a taxi driver, while also rejecting one man’s appeal against his conviction. Justices Anthony Gates, Brian Keith, and Terence Arnold delivered their decision on October 30, 2025, in the case concerning Asesela Naureure and Moape Rokoraicebe, who faced charges stemming from crimes committed in November 2016.
Justice Keith highlighted the vulnerabilities of taxi drivers in Fiji, noting their susceptibility to crime due to their handling of cash and often being alone during their shifts. He stressed the need for robust protective measures within the legal system, asserting that “Taxi drivers are one of the most vulnerable groups of people in Fiji.” This statement underscores the judicial system’s recognition of the unique challenges faced by these workers and the necessity for significant penalties for those who target them.
Although the offenses were serious, the Supreme Court found that the original sentences imposed by lower courts were excessively harsh. They ruled that failing to grant the appeals against their sentences would lead to a “substantial and grave injustice.” As a result, while Naureure’s appeal against his conviction was denied, both men were allowed to contest their sentences.
In a noteworthy shift, the Supreme Court established new sentences for each defendant. Naureure’s prison term was adjusted to 10 years and 7 months, with a non-parole period of 8 years and 7 months, while Rokoraicebe received a revised sentence of 10 years and 5 months, accompanied by a non-parole period of 8 years and 5 months. This change comes as Naureure’s initial sentence was 13 years from the High Court, and Rokoraicebe had been sentenced to 12 years starting from his arrest.
This case reflects ongoing judicial efforts to tackle the increasing dangers faced by taxi drivers and other public transport workers. A related incident involving three young men who received suspended sentences for a violent robbery against a taxi driver has also highlighted the balance the courts seek to achieve between punishment and rehabilitation, particularly for first-time offenders.
These judicial decisions not only aim to hold criminals accountable but also hint at potential reform and rehabilitation opportunities for offenders. The ongoing commitment of the judiciary to community safety and the protection of vulnerable groups, such as taxi drivers, offers a hopeful perspective on the future of criminal justice in Fiji.