A whistleblower report detailing significant governance concerns at Fiji National University (FNU) has come to light, naming key officials and raising critical issues about appointees, academic criteria, and potential electoral law violations. The report, which was sent to Education Minister Aseri Radrodro in October last year and reviewed by The Fiji Times, highlights actions during the tenure of vice-chancellor Unaisi Nabobo-Baba.
The whistleblower questions the merit-based nature of a promotion given to a staff member to the position of assistant professor while that individual was serving as the acting head of school. Allegations suggest that this appointment may not have adhered to FNU’s minimum qualification requirements, which typically demand a PhD level of education (FQF Level 10) or, in exceptional cases, a Master’s degree (FQF Level 9) combined with considerable ongoing research contributions, peer-reviewed publications, and supervised postgraduate projects.
In raising these serious inquiries, the report questions the integrity of the university’s promotion procedures. “This is not about personalities – it is about institutional integrity,” it asserts, emphasizing that when policies are overlooked in appointments and promotions, the university’s credibility faces significant jeopardy.
Attempts to reach the staff member involved for clarification were unsuccessful, as they directed inquiries to the university’s vice-chancellor. An email containing the allegations was sent to the vice-chancellor, Acting Prime Minister Filimoni Vosarogo, and Minister Radrodro, yet no responses were received from any party at the time of reporting. The Prime Minister’s Office redirected questions to the Ministry of National Planning Development and Statistics, where permanent secretary Peni Sikivou has yet to respond.
Additionally, the whistleblower alleges a possible breach of electoral law, claiming that a staff member contested the 2022 General Election while remaining an FNU employee, subsequently returning to work without undergoing a formal reappointment process. The report notes that the Electoral Offences Act mandates employees of publicly funded institutions to resign before pursuing candidacy. Concerns regarding whether requisite protocols were followed, including the existence of a resignation letter, remain unanswered.
This report illuminates the crucial need for accountability and transparency within academic institutions. With governance concerns being raised, it serves as a vital reminder of the importance of adhering to established standards and practices for the integrity and trustworthiness of educational bodies.