Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to a ceasefire effective Friday, as announced by U.S. President Donald Trump following talks with both nations’ leaders. This agreement comes after five days of fierce fighting along the contested 817-km (508-mile) border, leading to at least 20 fatalities and over 260 injuries, along with the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people.
In a message posted on Truth Social, President Trump stated that both Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet showed a willingness to return to the previously established Peace Accord. Trump characterized the agreement as a crucial step towards restoring regional stability.
However, Prime Minister Anutin’s response was more measured. While he acknowledged the discussions with Trump, he did not confirm a mutual cessation of violence, emphasizing Thailand’s role as a retaliatory force in the conflict. He noted that for peace to materialize, Cambodia needs to demonstrate its commitment by halting its military operations and pulling back its troops.
The recent surge in violence has been marked by significant artillery and rocket exchanges, reflecting one of the most intense periods of conflict since Trump’s prior intervention in July, when he helped broker an initial ceasefire. Historical tensions between the two countries, further complicated by accusations of landmine use and territorial invasions, cast doubt on the sustainability of the ceasefire.
While Trump expressed optimism about his mediation efforts, the situation remains delicate. Thai officials have indicated their intention to reduce Cambodia’s military capabilities.
Additionally, there are questions surrounding the implications of U.S. tariffs, which Trump has previously utilized in peace negotiations. However, Thailand’s foreign minister has dismissed the notion that tariffs would serve as leveraging tools in the current scenario, suggesting a more intricate geopolitical situation.
As diplomatic efforts persist, the hope for lasting peace hinges on both nations’ willingness to engage in constructive dialogue and cooperation, indicating that despite the current tensions, a path forward remains possible if both sides commit to unity and resolution.