The ongoing drug crisis in Fiji is increasingly alarming, with experts highlighting the inadequacy of law enforcement as a key factor exacerbating the situation. Natalie Raikadroka, a Legal Officer at the University of Fiji, emphasized that the Proceeds of Crime Act 1997 is not being effectively implemented, allowing drug offenders to operate without significant hindrance. She argued that if law enforcement were to dismantle the financial motivations behind drug trafficking, it could discourage dealers from continuing their illegal activities.
Raikadroka pointed out that the Proceeds of Crime Act provides mechanisms for the confiscation and seizure of assets connected to the illegal drug trade. She suggested that a more vigorous enforcement of these provisions could make a notable difference in combating the crisis. The current lack of enforcement, she warned, poses a severe threat to society by enabling drug trading without repercussions.
Inspector Jemesa Lave from the Ministry of Policing echoed these concerns, acknowledging significant gaps in the law’s application. He affirmed the commitment from both the police and the government to address these enforcement challenges, aiming to enhance the efficacy of the Proceeds of Crime Act. Lave stated, “I believe some of the implementation of the Proceeds of Crime Act is not being well run by some of the enforcement agencies.”
These comments were made during public consultations for the proposed Counter Narcotics Bill in Lautoka, where various stakeholders highlighted the pressing need for more robust measures to dismantle the drug trade and protect communities. This dialogue around new legislation reflects a growing consensus on the necessity of stronger enforcement strategies to combat Fiji’s drug crisis effectively. As discussions continue, there is hope for a more determined approach that could lead to meaningful change and improved safety within communities.