A California judge has reinstated a sexual assault lawsuit against musician Marilyn Manson, whose real name is Brian Warner, after reversing his earlier dismissal of the case. This decision comes following the enactment of a new state law that allows survivors of sexual assault to file claims that may have previously been barred by the statute of limitations.
During a Monday morning hearing, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Steve Cochran indicated that he had thoroughly reviewed the situation and decided that the new law, known as AB 250, applies to the case brought forth by former assistant Ashley Walters. This law, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in October, provides a two-year window for adult survivors to bring forth claims. Judge Cochran vacated his December 16 dismissal and permitted Walters to re-file her complaint, scheduling a follow-up hearing for March 27.
Warner’s attorney, Howard King, expressed his intention to appeal the ruling, asserting that the allegations against Manson do not qualify as sexual assault under California law. King stated, “The undeniable fact is that Mr. Warner never committed any sexual assault.”
Walters has been pursuing her lawsuit since 2021, alleging that Manson sexually assaulted her in 2010 after they initially connected over social media. The suit details a disturbing encounter where she alleges Manson pinned her down, attempted to kiss her, and forcibly touched her. She later became Manson’s assistant, claiming she endured further abuse during that period, including instances of physical violence and emotional distress.
Advocates for Walters assert that her claims meet the legal definition of sexual battery, as outlined in California law, particularly under AB 250’s provisions that also allow for the revival of related claims such as sexual harassment and wrongful termination. Despite the renewed opportunity for legal recourse, Judge Cochran indicated that Warner would also be allowed to file a motion for summary judgment to contest the relevance of Walters’ claims under the new law, meaning the case could return to an earlier stage for reconsideration.
In a broader context, Walters’ case highlights the complications and evolving nature of sexual assault litigation, particularly as state laws change to offer more support for survivors. As discussions continue in the courtroom, the case reflects ongoing discussions about accountability and justice for survivors of abuse, fostering optimism for those seeking to address their past traumas through legal channels.