The Hollywood studio system continues to grapple with its tendency to revisit past successes, and the latest example is the reboot of “Anaconda,” a film originally released in 1997. While the original movie, featuring stars like Jennifer Lopez and Ice Cube, was received poorly yet humorously by audiences due to its campy dialogue and outrageous plot decisions, the new iteration seeks to blend satire with horror, under the direction of Tommy Gormican.
Gormican, known for his work on the quirky meta-comedy “The Incredible Weight of Massive Talent,” attempts to reshape “Anaconda” into a commentary on the film industry’s reliance on outdated intellectual properties. The script, co-written with Kevin Etten, poses a question about the nature of reboots—whether they serve as a genuine update, a reimagining, or a “spiritual sequel.” While the film acknowledges its predecessor, it also engages with the absurdity of Hollywood’s fixation on reviving lesser-known franchises.
This new version follows a group of amateur filmmakers, led by struggling actor Griff, played by Paul Rudd, and his buddy Doug, portrayed by Jack Black. These characters embark on a trip to Brazil to jumpstart the snake franchise, only to face the unexpected threat of a giant CG snake. Supporting characters include Griff’s childhood love Claire, played by Thandiwe Newton, and the unpredictable Kenny, whose antics regularly complicate their production efforts.
The film aims to capture the spirit of camaraderie seen in classics like “Super 8” and “Son of Rambow.” However, Gormican also strives to uphold elements of horror, resulting in a mix that struggles to balance comedy with suspense. To weave in plot depth, a storyline about illegal gold mining in the Amazon emerges, introducing a character named Ana, which diverts focus from the satirical elements that might have flourished.
Despite its intriguing premise, the film’s execution disappoints, often relying on slapstick humor rather than clever dialogue or biting satire. The lack of humor also extends to opportunities where characters could reference the original “Anaconda,” diminishing potential laugh-out-loud moments. The film, which is reportedly PG-13, cuts back on potentially shocking sequences, failing to fully embrace its horror elements or explore character fatalities, which ultimately detracts from engaging the audience in suspenseful storytelling.
This new “Anaconda” reflects the industry’s self-referential humor but lacks the sharpness needed to deliver a potent critique of its practices. Ideally, the film could have embraced a more daring approach, akin to the satirical brilliance of “Tropic Thunder.” However, without a solid comedic foundation, it remains a tepid recall of past glories rather than a fresh, satirical take on the genre.